Côte d'Ivoire vs Portugal: Forcibly displaced people
Forcibly displaced people over time
- Côte d'Ivoire
- Portugal
How they compare
Côte d'Ivoire currently reports 82,807 against 78,944 in Portugal, a difference of 3,863.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Côte d'Ivoire ahead.
Côte d'Ivoire ranks 84th and Portugal ranks 86th of 180 countries.
Côte d'Ivoire has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Côte d'Ivoire | Portugal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 281,235 | 1,430 | 279,804 | Côte d'Ivoire |
| 2020s | 186,069 | 47,217 | 138,852 | Côte d'Ivoire |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forcibly displaced people, Côte d'Ivoire or Portugal?
- Côte d'Ivoire, at 82,807 against 78,944 in Portugal as of 2025.
- What is the difference in forcibly displaced people between Côte d'Ivoire and Portugal?
- 3,863, with Côte d'Ivoire ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Côte d'Ivoire and Portugal?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2025.
- How do Côte d'Ivoire and Portugal rank globally for forcibly displaced people?
- Côte d'Ivoire ranks 84th and Portugal ranks 86th of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Refugee Population Statistics Database, UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), published as Forcibly displaced people. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Forcibly displaced people are represented by the sum of (1) refugees (and people in a refugee-like situation) under the mandate of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), (2) refugees under the mandate of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA), (3) asylum-seekers, (4) other people in need of international protection, and (5) internally displaced people (IDPs). Situations in which people are reported in more than one of these categories are accounted for, to the extent possible.