Cape Verde vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Forcibly displaced people
Forcibly displaced people over time
- Cape Verde
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 5 against 0 in Cape Verde, a difference of 5.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Saint Kitts and Nevis has been ahead every year.
Cape Verde ranks 176th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 173rd of 180 countries.
Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 | 5 | 5 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2020s | 0 | 18 | 18 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forcibly displaced people, Cape Verde or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 5 against 0 in Cape Verde as of 2025.
- What is the difference in forcibly displaced people between Cape Verde and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 5, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2025.
- How do Cape Verde and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for forcibly displaced people?
- Cape Verde ranks 176th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 173rd of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Refugee Population Statistics Database, UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), published as Forcibly displaced people. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Forcibly displaced people are represented by the sum of (1) refugees (and people in a refugee-like situation) under the mandate of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), (2) refugees under the mandate of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA), (3) asylum-seekers, (4) other people in need of international protection, and (5) internally displaced people (IDPs). Situations in which people are reported in more than one of these categories are accounted for, to the extent possible.