Papua New Guinea vs Serbia: Estimate of current tobacco use prevalence
Papua New Guinea
37.5%
in 2030
Serbia
35.8%
in 2030
Papua New Guinea rank
6th
Serbia rank
9th
Estimate of current tobacco use prevalence over time
- Papua New Guinea
- Serbia
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 37.5% against 35.8% in Serbia, a difference of 1.7%.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.
Papua New Guinea ranks 6th and Serbia ranks 9th of 166 countries.
Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Papua New Guinea | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 52.4% | 39.2% | 13.1% | Papua New Guinea |
| 2010s | 46.7% | 37.9% | 8.9% | Papua New Guinea |
| 2020s | 40.9% | 36.5% | 4.4% | Papua New Guinea |
| 2030s | 37.5% | 35.8% | 1.7% | Papua New Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher estimate of current tobacco use prevalence, Papua New Guinea or Serbia?
- Papua New Guinea, at 37.5% against 35.8% in Serbia as of 2030.
- What is the difference in estimate of current tobacco use prevalence between Papua New Guinea and Serbia?
- 1.7%, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Serbia?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2030.
- How do Papua New Guinea and Serbia rank globally for estimate of current tobacco use prevalence?
- Papua New Guinea ranks 6th and Serbia ranks 9th of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Estimate of current tobacco use prevalence (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.