Marshall Islands vs Nauru: Estimate of current tobacco use prevalence
Marshall Islands
31.0%
in 2030
Nauru
30.2%
in 2030
Marshall Islands rank
15th
Nauru rank
18th
Estimate of current tobacco use prevalence over time
- Marshall Islands
- Nauru
How they compare
Marshall Islands currently reports 31.0% against 30.2% in Nauru, a difference of 0.8%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Nauru ahead.
Marshall Islands ranks 15th and Nauru ranks 18th of 166 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Marshall Islands averaged higher in 1 and Nauru in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Marshall Islands | Nauru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 30.1% | 60.6% | 30.5% | Nauru |
| 2010s | 30.4% | 48.0% | 17.6% | Nauru |
| 2020s | 30.9% | 36.5% | 5.5% | Nauru |
| 2030s | 31.0% | 30.2% | 0.8% | Marshall Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher estimate of current tobacco use prevalence, Marshall Islands or Nauru?
- Marshall Islands, at 31.0% against 30.2% in Nauru as of 2030.
- What is the difference in estimate of current tobacco use prevalence between Marshall Islands and Nauru?
- 0.8%, with Marshall Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Marshall Islands and Nauru?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2030.
- How do Marshall Islands and Nauru rank globally for estimate of current tobacco use prevalence?
- Marshall Islands ranks 15th and Nauru ranks 18th of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Estimate of current tobacco use prevalence (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.