Muş vs East Timor: Estimate of current tobacco use prevalence (%) (age-standardized)
Muş
16.0%
in 2030
East Timor
49.7%
in 2030
Muş rank
1st
East Timor rank
2nd
Estimate of current tobacco use prevalence (%) (age-standardized) over time
- Muş
- East Timor
How they compare
East Timor currently reports 49.7% against 16.0% in Muş, a difference of 33.7%.
That makes East Timor's figure about 3.1 times Muş's.
Across all 11 years both countries report, East Timor has been ahead every year.
Muş ranks 1st and East Timor ranks 2nd of 1 regions.
East Timor has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Muş | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 25.1% | 47.1% | 22.0% | East Timor |
| 2010s | 21.5% | 47.8% | 26.2% | East Timor |
| 2020s | 18.0% | 48.7% | 30.7% | East Timor |
| 2030s | 16.0% | 49.7% | 33.7% | East Timor |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher estimate of current tobacco use prevalence (%), Muş or East Timor?
- East Timor, at 49.7% against 16.0% in Muş as of 2030.
- What is the difference in estimate of current tobacco use prevalence (%) between Muş and East Timor?
- 33.7%, with East Timor ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Muş and East Timor?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2030.
- How do Muş and East Timor rank globally for estimate of current tobacco use prevalence (%)?
- Muş ranks 1st and East Timor ranks 2nd of 1 regions.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Estimate of current tobacco use prevalence (%) (age-standardized). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.