EMR vs Palestine: Estimate of current tobacco use prevalence (%)
EMR
16.9%
in 2030
Palestine
38.1%
in 2030
EMR rank
8th
Palestine rank
6th
Estimate of current tobacco use prevalence (%) over time
- EMR
- Palestine
How they compare
Palestine currently reports 38.1% against 16.9% in EMR, a difference of 21.2%.
That makes Palestine's figure about 2.3 times EMR's.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Palestine has been ahead every year.
EMR ranks 8th and Palestine ranks 6th of 13 groups.
Palestine has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | EMR | Palestine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 24.8% | 28.6% | 3.8% | Palestine |
| 2010s | 21.1% | 31.1% | 10.0% | Palestine |
| 2020s | 18.2% | 35.0% | 16.8% | Palestine |
| 2030s | 16.9% | 38.1% | 21.2% | Palestine |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher estimate of current tobacco use prevalence (%), EMR or Palestine?
- Palestine, at 38.1% against 16.9% in EMR as of 2030.
- What is the difference in estimate of current tobacco use prevalence (%) between EMR and Palestine?
- 21.2%, with Palestine ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for EMR and Palestine?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2030.
- How do EMR and Palestine rank globally for estimate of current tobacco use prevalence (%)?
- EMR ranks 8th and Palestine ranks 6th of 13 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Estimate of current tobacco use prevalence (%) (age-standardized). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.