Singapore vs Tajikistan: Electoral democracy (V-Dem)
Singapore
1
in 2025
Tajikistan
1
in 2025
Singapore rank
87th
Tajikistan rank
87th
Electoral democracy (V-Dem) over time
- Singapore
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Singapore currently reports 1 against 1 in Tajikistan, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 158 shared years of data; in 1868 it was Tajikistan ahead.
Singapore ranks 87th and Tajikistan ranks 87th of 176 countries.
Across the 17 decades both report, Singapore averaged higher in 4 and Tajikistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Singapore | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1860s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1870s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1880s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | Tajikistan |
| 1920s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 0.5 | 0 | 0.5 | Singapore |
| 1960s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Singapore |
| 1970s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Singapore |
| 1980s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Singapore |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher electoral democracy, Singapore or Tajikistan?
- Singapore, at 1 against 1 in Tajikistan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in electoral democracy between Singapore and Tajikistan?
- 0, with Singapore ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Singapore and Tajikistan?
- 158 years are reported by both, from 1868 to 2025.
- How do Singapore and Tajikistan rank globally for electoral democracy?
- Singapore ranks 87th and Tajikistan ranks 87th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Electoral democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Identifies the political regime of a country using the Regimes of the World classification by political scientists Anna Lührmann, Marcus Tannenberg and Staffan Lindberg.