Portugal vs Uruguay: Electoral democracy

Portugal
2
in 2025
Uruguay
2
in 2025
Portugal rank
1st
Uruguay rank
1st

Electoral democracy over time

  • Portugal
  • Uruguay
00.511.52178919072025

How they compare

Portugal currently reports 2 against 2 in Uruguay, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 201 shared years of data; in 1825 it was Uruguay ahead.

Portugal ranks 1st and Uruguay ranks 1st of 176 countries.

Across the 21 decades both report, Portugal averaged higher in 2 and Uruguay in 14.

Head to head by decade

Decade Portugal Uruguay Difference Ahead
1820s 0 0 0
1830s 0 0.7 0.7 Uruguay
1840s 0 0.1 0.1 Uruguay
1850s 0 0.8 0.8 Uruguay
1860s 0 0.7 0.7 Uruguay
1870s 0 0.6 0.6 Uruguay
1880s 0 0.9 0.9 Uruguay
1890s 0 1 1 Uruguay
1900s 0 1 1 Uruguay
1910s 0.8 1 0.2 Uruguay
1920s 0.6 1.7 1.1 Uruguay
1930s 0 1.3 1.3 Uruguay
1940s 0.5 2 1.5 Uruguay
1950s 0.9 2 1.1 Uruguay
1960s 0.1 2 1.9 Uruguay
1970s 0.8 0.6 0.2 Portugal
1980s 2 1 1 Portugal
1990s 2 2 0
2000s 2 2 0
2010s 2 2 0
2020s 2 2 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher electoral democracy, Portugal or Uruguay?
Portugal, at 2 against 2 in Uruguay as of 2025.
What is the difference in electoral democracy between Portugal and Uruguay?
0, with Portugal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Portugal and Uruguay?
201 years are reported by both, from 1825 to 2025.
How do Portugal and Uruguay rank globally for electoral democracy?
Portugal ranks 1st and Uruguay ranks 1st of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Electoral democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Electoral democracy
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,594 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Identifies the political regime of a country using the Regimes of the World classification by political scientists Anna Lührmann, Marcus Tannenberg and Staffan Lindberg.