Paraguay vs Sweden: Electoral democracy

Paraguay
2
in 2025
Sweden
2
in 2025
Paraguay rank
1st
Sweden rank
1st

Electoral democracy over time

  • Paraguay
  • Sweden
00.511.52178919072025

How they compare

Paraguay currently reports 2 against 2 in Sweden, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 214 shared years of data; in 1811 it was Sweden ahead.

Paraguay ranks 1st and Sweden ranks 1st of 176 countries.

Across the 22 decades both report, Paraguay averaged higher in 4 and Sweden in 9.

Head to head by decade

Decade Paraguay Sweden Difference Ahead
1810s 0 0 0
1820s 0 0 0
1830s 0 0 0
1840s 0 0 0
1850s 0 0 0
1860s 0 0 0
1870s 0.4 0 0.4 Paraguay
1880s 0.3 0 0.3 Paraguay
1890s 1 0 1 Paraguay
1900s 0.9 0 0.9 Paraguay
1910s 0 0.3 0.3 Sweden
1920s 0 1.8 1.8 Sweden
1930s 0.3 2 1.7 Sweden
1940s 0.7778 2 1.22 Sweden
1950s 0.5 2 1.5 Sweden
1960s 0.7 2 1.3 Sweden
1970s 1 2 1 Sweden
1980s 1 2 1 Sweden
1990s 1.7 2 0.3 Sweden
2000s 2 2 0
2010s 2 2 0
2020s 2 2 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher electoral democracy, Paraguay or Sweden?
Paraguay, at 2 against 2 in Sweden as of 2025.
What is the difference in electoral democracy between Paraguay and Sweden?
0, with Paraguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Paraguay and Sweden?
214 years are reported by both, from 1811 to 2025.
How do Paraguay and Sweden rank globally for electoral democracy?
Paraguay ranks 1st and Sweden ranks 1st of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Electoral democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Electoral democracy
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,594 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Identifies the political regime of a country using the Regimes of the World classification by political scientists Anna Lührmann, Marcus Tannenberg and Staffan Lindberg.