Paraguay vs Romania: Electoral democracy

Paraguay
2
in 2025
Romania
2
in 2025
Paraguay rank
1st
Romania rank
1st

Electoral democracy over time

  • Paraguay
  • Romania
00.511.52181119182025

How they compare

Paraguay currently reports 2 against 2 in Romania, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 194 shared years of data; in 1831 it was Romania ahead.

Paraguay ranks 1st and Romania ranks 1st of 176 countries.

Across the 20 decades both report, Paraguay averaged higher in 9 and Romania in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Paraguay Romania Difference Ahead
1830s 0 0 0
1840s 0 0 0
1850s 0 0 0
1860s 0 0 0
1870s 0.4 0 0.4 Paraguay
1880s 0.3 0 0.3 Paraguay
1890s 1 0 1 Paraguay
1900s 0.9 0 0.9 Paraguay
1910s 0 0 0
1920s 0 0 0
1930s 0.3 0 0.3 Paraguay
1940s 0.7778 0 0.7778 Paraguay
1950s 0.5 0 0.5 Paraguay
1960s 0.7 0.9 0.2 Romania
1970s 1 0.5 0.5 Paraguay
1980s 1 0 1 Paraguay
1990s 1.7 2 0.3 Romania
2000s 2 2 0
2010s 2 2 0
2020s 2 2 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher electoral democracy, Paraguay or Romania?
Paraguay, at 2 against 2 in Romania as of 2025.
What is the difference in electoral democracy between Paraguay and Romania?
0, with Paraguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Paraguay and Romania?
194 years are reported by both, from 1831 to 2025.
How do Paraguay and Romania rank globally for electoral democracy?
Paraguay ranks 1st and Romania ranks 1st of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Electoral democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Electoral democracy
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,594 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Identifies the political regime of a country using the Regimes of the World classification by political scientists Anna Lührmann, Marcus Tannenberg and Staffan Lindberg.