Pakistan vs Turkmenistan: Electoral democracy (V-Dem)
Pakistan
1
in 2025
Turkmenistan
1
in 2025
Pakistan rank
87th
Turkmenistan rank
87th
Electoral democracy (V-Dem) over time
- Pakistan
- Turkmenistan
How they compare
Pakistan currently reports 1 against 1 in Turkmenistan, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 130 shared years of data; in 1896 it was Turkmenistan ahead.
Pakistan ranks 87th and Turkmenistan ranks 87th of 176 countries.
Across the 14 decades both report, Pakistan averaged higher in 7 and Turkmenistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Pakistan | Turkmenistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | Turkmenistan |
| 1920s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0.1 | 0 | 0.1 | Pakistan |
| 1950s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 0.1 | 0 | 0.1 | Pakistan |
| 1980s | 0.5 | 0 | 0.5 | Pakistan |
| 1990s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Pakistan |
| 2000s | 0.8 | 0 | 0.8 | Pakistan |
| 2010s | 1 | 0.2 | 0.8 | Pakistan |
| 2020s | 1 | 0.6667 | 0.3333 | Pakistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher electoral democracy, Pakistan or Turkmenistan?
- Pakistan, at 1 against 1 in Turkmenistan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in electoral democracy between Pakistan and Turkmenistan?
- 0, with Pakistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Turkmenistan?
- 130 years are reported by both, from 1896 to 2025.
- How do Pakistan and Turkmenistan rank globally for electoral democracy?
- Pakistan ranks 87th and Turkmenistan ranks 87th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Electoral democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Identifies the political regime of a country using the Regimes of the World classification by political scientists Anna Lührmann, Marcus Tannenberg and Staffan Lindberg.