North Macedonia vs Seychelles: Electoral democracy

North Macedonia
2
in 2025
Seychelles
2
in 2025
North Macedonia rank
1st
Seychelles rank
1st

Electoral democracy over time

  • North Macedonia
  • Seychelles
00.511.52178919072025

How they compare

North Macedonia currently reports 2 against 2 in Seychelles, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 120 shared years of data; in 1903 it was Seychelles ahead.

North Macedonia ranks 1st and Seychelles ranks 1st of 176 countries.

Across the 13 decades both report, North Macedonia averaged higher in 1 and Seychelles in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade North Macedonia Seychelles Difference Ahead
1900s 0 0 0
1910s 0 0 0
1920s 0 0 0
1930s 0 0 0
1940s 0 0 0
1950s 0 0 0
1960s 0 0 0
1970s 0 0.8 0.8 Seychelles
1980s 0 0.7 0.7 Seychelles
1990s 0.7 1 0.3 Seychelles
2000s 1.8 1 0.8 North Macedonia
2010s 1.4 1.5 0.1 Seychelles
2020s 2 2 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher electoral democracy, North Macedonia or Seychelles?
North Macedonia, at 2 against 2 in Seychelles as of 2025.
What is the difference in electoral democracy between North Macedonia and Seychelles?
0, with North Macedonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Seychelles?
120 years are reported by both, from 1903 to 2025.
How do North Macedonia and Seychelles rank globally for electoral democracy?
North Macedonia ranks 1st and Seychelles ranks 1st of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Electoral democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Electoral democracy
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,594 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Identifies the political regime of a country using the Regimes of the World classification by political scientists Anna Lührmann, Marcus Tannenberg and Staffan Lindberg.