South Korea vs Poland: Electoral democracy

South Korea
2
in 2025
Poland
2
in 2025
South Korea rank
1st
Poland rank
1st

Electoral democracy over time

  • South Korea
  • Poland
00.511.52178919072025

How they compare

South Korea currently reports 2 against 2 in Poland, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 169 shared years of data; in 1789 it was Poland ahead.

South Korea ranks 1st and Poland ranks 1st of 176 countries.

Across the 21 decades both report, South Korea averaged higher in 4 and Poland in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Korea Poland Difference Ahead
1780s 0 0 0
1790s 0 0 0
1800s 0 0 0
1810s 0 0 0
1820s 0 0 0
1830s 0 0 0
1840s 0 0 0
1850s 0 0 0
1860s 0 0 0
1910s 0 0.5 0.5 Poland
1920s 0 1.6 1.6 Poland
1930s 0 1 1 Poland
1940s 0.3333 0.5 0.1667 Poland
1950s 1 0.5 0.5 South Korea
1960s 0.9 0.1 0.8 South Korea
1970s 1 0 1 South Korea
1980s 1.2 0.1 1.1 South Korea
1990s 2 2 0
2000s 2 2 0
2010s 2 2 0
2020s 2 2 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher electoral democracy, South Korea or Poland?
South Korea, at 2 against 2 in Poland as of 2025.
What is the difference in electoral democracy between South Korea and Poland?
0, with South Korea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Korea and Poland?
169 years are reported by both, from 1789 to 2025.
How do South Korea and Poland rank globally for electoral democracy?
South Korea ranks 1st and Poland ranks 1st of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Electoral democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Electoral democracy
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,594 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Identifies the political regime of a country using the Regimes of the World classification by political scientists Anna Lührmann, Marcus Tannenberg and Staffan Lindberg.