Ireland vs Sweden: Electoral democracy

Ireland
2
in 2025
Sweden
2
in 2025
Ireland rank
1st
Sweden rank
1st

Electoral democracy over time

  • Ireland
  • Sweden
00.511.52178919072025

How they compare

Ireland currently reports 2 against 2 in Sweden, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 237 shared years of data; in 1789 it was Sweden ahead.

Ireland ranks 1st and Sweden ranks 1st of 176 countries.

Across the 25 decades both report, Ireland averaged higher in 13 and Sweden in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ireland Sweden Difference Ahead
1780s 0 0 0
1790s 1 0 1 Ireland
1800s 1 0 1 Ireland
1810s 1 0 1 Ireland
1820s 1 0 1 Ireland
1830s 1 0 1 Ireland
1840s 1 0 1 Ireland
1850s 1 0 1 Ireland
1860s 1 0 1 Ireland
1870s 1 0 1 Ireland
1880s 1 0 1 Ireland
1890s 1 0 1 Ireland
1900s 1 0 1 Ireland
1910s 0.9 0.3 0.6 Ireland
1920s 1.7 1.8 0.1 Sweden
1930s 2 2 0
1940s 2 2 0
1950s 2 2 0
1960s 2 2 0
1970s 2 2 0
1980s 2 2 0
1990s 2 2 0
2000s 2 2 0
2010s 2 2 0
2020s 2 2 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher electoral democracy, Ireland or Sweden?
Ireland, at 2 against 2 in Sweden as of 2025.
What is the difference in electoral democracy between Ireland and Sweden?
0, with Ireland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ireland and Sweden?
237 years are reported by both, from 1789 to 2025.
How do Ireland and Sweden rank globally for electoral democracy?
Ireland ranks 1st and Sweden ranks 1st of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Electoral democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Electoral democracy
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,594 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Identifies the political regime of a country using the Regimes of the World classification by political scientists Anna Lührmann, Marcus Tannenberg and Staffan Lindberg.