Ireland vs Peru: Electoral democracy

Ireland
2
in 2025
Peru
2
in 2025
Ireland rank
1st
Peru rank
1st

Electoral democracy over time

  • Ireland
  • Peru
00.511.52178919072025

How they compare

Ireland currently reports 2 against 2 in Peru, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 199 shared years of data; in 1821 it was Ireland ahead.

Ireland ranks 1st and Peru ranks 1st of 176 countries.

Ireland has averaged higher in every one of the 21 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ireland Peru Difference Ahead
1820s 1 0.7778 0.2222 Ireland
1830s 1 1 0
1840s 1 0.1 0.9 Ireland
1850s 1 0 1 Ireland
1860s 1 0 1 Ireland
1870s 1 0 1 Ireland
1880s 1 0.6667 0.3333 Ireland
1890s 1 0.125 0.875 Ireland
1900s 1 1 0
1910s 0.9 0.8 0.1 Ireland
1920s 1.7 1 0.7 Ireland
1930s 2 0.3 1.7 Ireland
1940s 2 0.8 1.2 Ireland
1950s 2 0.4 1.6 Ireland
1960s 2 0.7 1.3 Ireland
1970s 2 0 2 Ireland
1980s 2 1.9 0.1 Ireland
1990s 2 0.9 1.1 Ireland
2000s 2 1.9 0.1 Ireland
2010s 2 2 0
2020s 2 2 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher electoral democracy, Ireland or Peru?
Ireland, at 2 against 2 in Peru as of 2025.
What is the difference in electoral democracy between Ireland and Peru?
0, with Ireland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ireland and Peru?
199 years are reported by both, from 1821 to 2025.
How do Ireland and Peru rank globally for electoral democracy?
Ireland ranks 1st and Peru ranks 1st of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Electoral democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Electoral democracy
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,594 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Identifies the political regime of a country using the Regimes of the World classification by political scientists Anna Lührmann, Marcus Tannenberg and Staffan Lindberg.