Indonesia vs Serbia: Electoral democracy

Indonesia
1
in 2025
Serbia
1
in 2025
Indonesia rank
87th
Serbia rank
87th

Electoral democracy over time

  • Indonesia
  • Serbia
00.511.52178919072025

How they compare

Indonesia currently reports 1 against 1 in Serbia, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 194 shared years of data; in 1800 it was Serbia ahead.

Indonesia ranks 87th and Serbia ranks 87th of 176 countries.

Across the 22 decades both report, Indonesia averaged higher in 8 and Serbia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Indonesia Serbia Difference Ahead
1800s 0 0 0
1810s 0 0 0
1830s 0 0 0
1840s 0 0 0
1850s 0 0.1 0.1 Serbia
1860s 0 0 0
1870s 0 0 0
1880s 0 0 0
1890s 0 0 0
1900s 0 0 0
1910s 0 0 0
1920s 0 0 0
1930s 0 0 0
1940s 0 0 0
1950s 0.7 0 0.7 Indonesia
1960s 0.1 0 0.1 Indonesia
1970s 0.9 0 0.9 Indonesia
1980s 1 0 1 Indonesia
1990s 1.1 0.8 0.3 Indonesia
2000s 2 1.9 0.1 Indonesia
2010s 2 1.4 0.6 Indonesia
2020s 1.67 1 0.6667 Indonesia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher electoral democracy, Indonesia or Serbia?
Indonesia, at 1 against 1 in Serbia as of 2025.
What is the difference in electoral democracy between Indonesia and Serbia?
0, with Indonesia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Serbia?
194 years are reported by both, from 1800 to 2025.
How do Indonesia and Serbia rank globally for electoral democracy?
Indonesia ranks 87th and Serbia ranks 87th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Electoral democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Electoral democracy
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,594 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Identifies the political regime of a country using the Regimes of the World classification by political scientists Anna Lührmann, Marcus Tannenberg and Staffan Lindberg.