Indonesia vs Kazakhstan: Electoral democracy

Indonesia
1
in 2025
Kazakhstan
1
in 2025
Indonesia rank
87th
Kazakhstan rank
87th

Electoral democracy over time

  • Indonesia
  • Kazakhstan
00.511.52178919072025

How they compare

Indonesia currently reports 1 against 1 in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 226 shared years of data; in 1800 it was Kazakhstan ahead.

Indonesia ranks 87th and Kazakhstan ranks 87th of 176 countries.

Across the 23 decades both report, Indonesia averaged higher in 8 and Kazakhstan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Indonesia Kazakhstan Difference Ahead
1800s 0 0 0
1810s 0 0 0
1820s 0 0 0
1830s 0 0 0
1840s 0 0 0
1850s 0 0 0
1860s 0 0 0
1870s 0 0 0
1880s 0 0 0
1890s 0 0 0
1900s 0 0 0
1910s 0 0.1 0.1 Kazakhstan
1920s 0 0 0
1930s 0 0 0
1940s 0 0 0
1950s 0.7 0 0.7 Indonesia
1960s 0.1 0 0.1 Indonesia
1970s 0.9 0 0.9 Indonesia
1980s 1 0 1 Indonesia
1990s 1.1 1 0.1 Indonesia
2000s 2 1 1 Indonesia
2010s 2 1 1 Indonesia
2020s 1.67 1 0.6667 Indonesia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher electoral democracy, Indonesia or Kazakhstan?
Indonesia, at 1 against 1 in Kazakhstan as of 2025.
What is the difference in electoral democracy between Indonesia and Kazakhstan?
0, with Indonesia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Kazakhstan?
226 years are reported by both, from 1800 to 2025.
How do Indonesia and Kazakhstan rank globally for electoral democracy?
Indonesia ranks 87th and Kazakhstan ranks 87th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Electoral democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Electoral democracy
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,594 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Identifies the political regime of a country using the Regimes of the World classification by political scientists Anna Lührmann, Marcus Tannenberg and Staffan Lindberg.