Hungary vs Singapore: Electoral democracy

Hungary
1
in 2025
Singapore
1
in 2025
Hungary rank
87th
Singapore rank
87th

Electoral democracy over time

  • Hungary
  • Singapore
00.511.52178919072025

How they compare

Hungary currently reports 1 against 1 in Singapore, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 158 shared years of data; in 1868 it was Singapore ahead.

Hungary ranks 87th and Singapore ranks 87th of 176 countries.

Across the 17 decades both report, Hungary averaged higher in 12 and Singapore in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hungary Singapore Difference Ahead
1860s 0.5 0 0.5 Hungary
1870s 1 0 1 Hungary
1880s 1 0 1 Hungary
1890s 1 0 1 Hungary
1900s 1 0 1 Hungary
1910s 1 0 1 Hungary
1920s 1 0 1 Hungary
1930s 1 0 1 Hungary
1940s 0.9 0 0.9 Hungary
1950s 0 0.5 0.5 Singapore
1960s 0 1 1 Singapore
1970s 0 1 1 Singapore
1980s 0.1 1 0.9 Singapore
1990s 2 1 1 Hungary
2000s 2 1 1 Hungary
2010s 1.8 1 0.8 Hungary
2020s 1 1 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher electoral democracy, Hungary or Singapore?
Hungary, at 1 against 1 in Singapore as of 2025.
What is the difference in electoral democracy between Hungary and Singapore?
0, with Hungary ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Singapore?
158 years are reported by both, from 1868 to 2025.
How do Hungary and Singapore rank globally for electoral democracy?
Hungary ranks 87th and Singapore ranks 87th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Electoral democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Electoral democracy
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,594 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Identifies the political regime of a country using the Regimes of the World classification by political scientists Anna Lührmann, Marcus Tannenberg and Staffan Lindberg.