Guatemala vs Japan: Electoral democracy

Guatemala
2
in 2025
Japan
2
in 2025
Guatemala rank
1st
Japan rank
1st

Electoral democracy over time

  • Guatemala
  • Japan
00.511.52178919072025

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 2 against 2 in Japan, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 233 shared years of data; in 1789 it was Japan ahead.

Guatemala ranks 1st and Japan ranks 1st of 176 countries.

Across the 25 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 4 and Japan in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Japan Difference Ahead
1780s 0 0 0
1790s 0 0 0
1800s 0 0 0
1810s 0 0 0
1820s 0 0 0
1830s 0 0 0
1840s 0 0 0
1850s 0 0 0
1860s 0 0 0
1870s 0 0 0
1880s 0 0 0
1890s 0.6 0 0.6 Guatemala
1900s 0 0 0
1910s 0 0 0
1920s 0.7 0 0.7 Guatemala
1930s 0.5 0 0.5 Guatemala
1940s 0.6 0.1 0.5 Guatemala
1950s 0.4 1.6 1.2 Japan
1960s 0.4 2 1.6 Japan
1970s 1 2 1 Japan
1980s 0.6 2 1.4 Japan
1990s 1 2 1 Japan
2000s 2 2 0
2010s 2 2 0
2020s 2 2 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher electoral democracy, Guatemala or Japan?
Guatemala, at 2 against 2 in Japan as of 2025.
What is the difference in electoral democracy between Guatemala and Japan?
0, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Japan?
233 years are reported by both, from 1789 to 2025.
How do Guatemala and Japan rank globally for electoral democracy?
Guatemala ranks 1st and Japan ranks 1st of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Electoral democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Electoral democracy
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,594 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Identifies the political regime of a country using the Regimes of the World classification by political scientists Anna Lührmann, Marcus Tannenberg and Staffan Lindberg.