Georgia vs Thailand: Electoral democracy

Georgia
1
in 2025
Thailand
1
in 2025
Georgia rank
87th
Thailand rank
87th

Electoral democracy over time

  • Georgia
  • Thailand
00.511.52178919072025

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 1 against 1 in Thailand, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 225 shared years of data; in 1801 it was Thailand ahead.

Georgia ranks 87th and Thailand ranks 87th of 176 countries.

Across the 23 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 3 and Thailand in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia Thailand Difference Ahead
1800s 0 0 0
1810s 0 0 0
1820s 0 0 0
1830s 0 0 0
1840s 0 0 0
1850s 0 0 0
1860s 0 0 0
1870s 0 0 0
1880s 0 0 0
1890s 0 0 0
1900s 0 0 0
1910s 0.1 0 0.1 Georgia
1920s 0 0 0
1930s 0 0.7 0.7 Thailand
1940s 0 0.6 0.6 Thailand
1950s 0 0 0
1960s 0 0 0
1970s 0 0.2 0.2 Thailand
1980s 0 1 1 Thailand
1990s 1 1.1 0.1 Thailand
2000s 1.4 1.5 0.1 Thailand
2010s 1.8 0.4 1.4 Georgia
2020s 1.67 0.5 1.17 Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher electoral democracy, Georgia or Thailand?
Georgia, at 1 against 1 in Thailand as of 2025.
What is the difference in electoral democracy between Georgia and Thailand?
0, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Thailand?
225 years are reported by both, from 1801 to 2025.
How do Georgia and Thailand rank globally for electoral democracy?
Georgia ranks 87th and Thailand ranks 87th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Electoral democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Electoral democracy
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,594 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Identifies the political regime of a country using the Regimes of the World classification by political scientists Anna Lührmann, Marcus Tannenberg and Staffan Lindberg.