Equatorial Guinea vs Venezuela: Electoral democracy

Equatorial Guinea
1
in 2025
Venezuela
1
in 2025
Equatorial Guinea rank
87th
Venezuela rank
87th

Electoral democracy over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Venezuela
00.511.52178919072025

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 1 against 1 in Venezuela, a difference of 0.

Across all 119 years both countries report, Venezuela has been ahead every year.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 87th and Venezuela ranks 87th of 176 countries.

Venezuela has averaged higher in every one of the 13 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Venezuela Difference Ahead
1900s 0 0 0
1910s 0 0 0
1920s 0 0 0
1930s 0 0 0
1940s 0 0.1 0.1 Venezuela
1950s 0 0.2 0.2 Venezuela
1960s 0.2 2 1.8 Venezuela
1970s 0.6667 2 1.33 Venezuela
1980s 0 2 2 Venezuela
1990s 0.6 2 1.4 Venezuela
2000s 1 1.2 0.2 Venezuela
2010s 1 1 0
2020s 1 1 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher electoral democracy, Equatorial Guinea or Venezuela?
Equatorial Guinea, at 1 against 1 in Venezuela as of 2025.
What is the difference in electoral democracy between Equatorial Guinea and Venezuela?
0, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Venezuela?
119 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Venezuela rank globally for electoral democracy?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 87th and Venezuela ranks 87th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Electoral democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Electoral democracy
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,594 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Identifies the political regime of a country using the Regimes of the World classification by political scientists Anna Lührmann, Marcus Tannenberg and Staffan Lindberg.