Equatorial Guinea vs Mozambique: Electoral democracy
Equatorial Guinea
1
in 2025
Mozambique
1
in 2025
Equatorial Guinea rank
87th
Mozambique rank
87th
Electoral democracy over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Mozambique
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 1 against 1 in Mozambique, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 119 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Mozambique ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 87th and Mozambique ranks 87th of 176 countries.
Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 13 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Mozambique | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 0.2 | 0 | 0.2 | Equatorial Guinea |
| 1970s | 0.6667 | 0 | 0.6667 | Equatorial Guinea |
| 1980s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher electoral democracy, Equatorial Guinea or Mozambique?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 1 against 1 in Mozambique as of 2025.
- What is the difference in electoral democracy between Equatorial Guinea and Mozambique?
- 0, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Mozambique?
- 119 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Mozambique rank globally for electoral democracy?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 87th and Mozambique ranks 87th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Electoral democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Identifies the political regime of a country using the Regimes of the World classification by political scientists Anna Lührmann, Marcus Tannenberg and Staffan Lindberg.