Ecuador vs Sri Lanka: Electoral democracy

Ecuador
2
in 2025
Sri Lanka
2
in 2025
Ecuador rank
1st
Sri Lanka rank
1st

Electoral democracy over time

  • Ecuador
  • Sri Lanka
00.511.52183019272025

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 2 against 2 in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 125 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 1st and Sri Lanka ranks 1st of 176 countries.

Across the 13 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 9 and Sri Lanka in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1900s 0.6 0 0.6 Ecuador
1910s 0.9 0 0.9 Ecuador
1920s 0.9 0 0.9 Ecuador
1930s 0.7 0 0.7 Ecuador
1940s 0.7 0.5 0.2 Ecuador
1950s 1 2 1 Sri Lanka
1960s 0.5 2 1.5 Sri Lanka
1970s 0.2222 2 1.78 Sri Lanka
1980s 2 1.3 0.7 Ecuador
1990s 2 1.5 0.5 Ecuador
2000s 2 1.3 0.7 Ecuador
2010s 2 1.5 0.5 Ecuador
2020s 2 2 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher electoral democracy, Ecuador or Sri Lanka?
Ecuador, at 2 against 2 in Sri Lanka as of 2025.
What is the difference in electoral democracy between Ecuador and Sri Lanka?
0, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Sri Lanka?
125 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
How do Ecuador and Sri Lanka rank globally for electoral democracy?
Ecuador ranks 1st and Sri Lanka ranks 1st of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Electoral democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Electoral democracy
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,594 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Identifies the political regime of a country using the Regimes of the World classification by political scientists Anna Lührmann, Marcus Tannenberg and Staffan Lindberg.