Ecuador vs Ireland: Electoral democracy

Ecuador
2
in 2025
Ireland
2
in 2025
Ecuador rank
1st
Ireland rank
1st

Electoral democracy over time

  • Ecuador
  • Ireland
00.511.52178919072025

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 2 against 2 in Ireland, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 189 shared years of data; in 1830 it was Ireland ahead.

Ecuador ranks 1st and Ireland ranks 1st of 176 countries.

Ireland has averaged higher in every one of the 20 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Ireland Difference Ahead
1830s 0 1 1 Ireland
1840s 0 1 1 Ireland
1850s 0.2222 1 0.7778 Ireland
1860s 0.25 1 0.75 Ireland
1870s 0 1 1 Ireland
1880s 0.1111 1 0.8889 Ireland
1890s 0.7778 1 0.2222 Ireland
1900s 0.6 1 0.4 Ireland
1910s 0.9 0.9 0
1920s 0.9 1.7 0.8 Ireland
1930s 0.7 2 1.3 Ireland
1940s 0.7 2 1.3 Ireland
1950s 1 2 1 Ireland
1960s 0.5 2 1.5 Ireland
1970s 0.2222 2 1.78 Ireland
1980s 2 2 0
1990s 2 2 0
2000s 2 2 0
2010s 2 2 0
2020s 2 2 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher electoral democracy, Ecuador or Ireland?
Ecuador, at 2 against 2 in Ireland as of 2025.
What is the difference in electoral democracy between Ecuador and Ireland?
0, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Ireland?
189 years are reported by both, from 1830 to 2025.
How do Ecuador and Ireland rank globally for electoral democracy?
Ecuador ranks 1st and Ireland ranks 1st of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Electoral democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Electoral democracy
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,594 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Identifies the political regime of a country using the Regimes of the World classification by political scientists Anna Lührmann, Marcus Tannenberg and Staffan Lindberg.