Bulgaria vs Ecuador: Electoral democracy

Bulgaria
2
in 2025
Ecuador
2
in 2025
Bulgaria rank
1st
Ecuador rank
1st

Electoral democracy over time

  • Bulgaria
  • Ecuador
00.511.52178919072025

How they compare

Bulgaria currently reports 2 against 2 in Ecuador, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 189 shared years of data; in 1830 it was Ecuador ahead.

Bulgaria ranks 1st and Ecuador ranks 1st of 176 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 20 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bulgaria Ecuador Difference Ahead
1830s 0 0 0
1840s 0 0 0
1850s 0 0.2222 0.2222 Ecuador
1860s 0 0.25 0.25 Ecuador
1870s 0 0 0
1880s 0.1111 0.1111 0
1890s 0 0.7778 0.7778 Ecuador
1900s 0 0.6 0.6 Ecuador
1910s 0 0.9 0.9 Ecuador
1920s 0 0.9 0.9 Ecuador
1930s 0 0.7 0.7 Ecuador
1940s 0.6 0.7 0.1 Ecuador
1950s 0 1 1 Ecuador
1960s 0 0.5 0.5 Ecuador
1970s 0 0.2222 0.2222 Ecuador
1980s 0 2 2 Ecuador
1990s 2 2 0
2000s 2 2 0
2010s 2 2 0
2020s 2 2 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher electoral democracy, Bulgaria or Ecuador?
Bulgaria, at 2 against 2 in Ecuador as of 2025.
What is the difference in electoral democracy between Bulgaria and Ecuador?
0, with Bulgaria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bulgaria and Ecuador?
189 years are reported by both, from 1830 to 2025.
How do Bulgaria and Ecuador rank globally for electoral democracy?
Bulgaria ranks 1st and Ecuador ranks 1st of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Electoral democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Electoral democracy
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,594 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Identifies the political regime of a country using the Regimes of the World classification by political scientists Anna Lührmann, Marcus Tannenberg and Staffan Lindberg.