Brazil vs Paraguay: Electoral democracy

Brazil
2
in 2025
Paraguay
2
in 2025
Brazil rank
1st
Paraguay rank
1st

Electoral democracy over time

  • Brazil
  • Paraguay
00.511.52178919072025

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 2 against 2 in Paraguay, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 212 shared years of data; in 1811 it was Paraguay ahead.

Brazil ranks 1st and Paraguay ranks 1st of 176 countries.

Across the 22 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 8 and Paraguay in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Paraguay Difference Ahead
1810s 0 0 0
1820s 0 0 0
1830s 0.9 0 0.9 Brazil
1840s 0 0 0
1850s 0 0 0
1860s 0 0 0
1870s 0 0.4 0.4 Paraguay
1880s 0 0.3 0.3 Paraguay
1890s 0.4 1 0.6 Paraguay
1900s 1 0.9 0.1 Brazil
1910s 1 0 1 Brazil
1920s 1 0 1 Brazil
1930s 0 0.3 0.3 Paraguay
1940s 0 0.7778 0.7778 Paraguay
1950s 1 0.5 0.5 Brazil
1960s 1 0.7 0.3 Brazil
1970s 1 1 0
1980s 1.3 1 0.3 Brazil
1990s 2 1.7 0.3 Brazil
2000s 2 2 0
2010s 2 2 0
2020s 2 2 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher electoral democracy, Brazil or Paraguay?
Brazil, at 2 against 2 in Paraguay as of 2025.
What is the difference in electoral democracy between Brazil and Paraguay?
0, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Paraguay?
212 years are reported by both, from 1811 to 2025.
How do Brazil and Paraguay rank globally for electoral democracy?
Brazil ranks 1st and Paraguay ranks 1st of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Electoral democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Electoral democracy
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,594 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Identifies the political regime of a country using the Regimes of the World classification by political scientists Anna Lührmann, Marcus Tannenberg and Staffan Lindberg.