Brazil vs Bulgaria: Electoral democracy

Brazil
2
in 2025
Bulgaria
2
in 2025
Brazil rank
1st
Bulgaria rank
1st

Electoral democracy over time

  • Brazil
  • Bulgaria
00.511.52178919072025

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 2 against 2 in Bulgaria, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 235 shared years of data; in 1789 it was Bulgaria ahead.

Brazil ranks 1st and Bulgaria ranks 1st of 176 countries.

Across the 25 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 9 and Bulgaria in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Bulgaria Difference Ahead
1780s 0 0 0
1790s 0 0 0
1800s 0 0 0
1810s 0 0 0
1820s 0 0 0
1830s 0.9 0 0.9 Brazil
1840s 0 0 0
1850s 0 0 0
1860s 0 0 0
1870s 0 0 0
1880s 0 0.1 0.1 Bulgaria
1890s 0.4 0 0.4 Brazil
1900s 1 0 1 Brazil
1910s 1 0 1 Brazil
1920s 1 0 1 Brazil
1930s 0 0 0
1940s 0 0.6 0.6 Bulgaria
1950s 1 0 1 Brazil
1960s 1 0 1 Brazil
1970s 1 0 1 Brazil
1980s 1.3 0 1.3 Brazil
1990s 2 2 0
2000s 2 2 0
2010s 2 2 0
2020s 2 2 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher electoral democracy, Brazil or Bulgaria?
Brazil, at 2 against 2 in Bulgaria as of 2025.
What is the difference in electoral democracy between Brazil and Bulgaria?
0, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Bulgaria?
235 years are reported by both, from 1789 to 2025.
How do Brazil and Bulgaria rank globally for electoral democracy?
Brazil ranks 1st and Bulgaria ranks 1st of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Electoral democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Electoral democracy
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,594 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Identifies the political regime of a country using the Regimes of the World classification by political scientists Anna Lührmann, Marcus Tannenberg and Staffan Lindberg.