Belgium vs Liberia: Electoral democracy

Belgium
2
in 2025
Liberia
2
in 2025
Belgium rank
1st
Liberia rank
1st

Electoral democracy over time

  • Belgium
  • Liberia
00.511.52178919072025

How they compare

Belgium currently reports 2 against 2 in Liberia, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 204 shared years of data; in 1821 it was Liberia ahead.

Belgium ranks 1st and Liberia ranks 1st of 176 countries.

Across the 21 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 11 and Liberia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium Liberia Difference Ahead
1820s 0 0 0
1830s 0.8 0 0.8 Belgium
1840s 1 0.2 0.8 Belgium
1850s 1 1 0
1860s 1 1 0
1870s 1 1 0
1880s 1 1 0
1890s 1 1 0
1900s 2 1 1 Belgium
1910s 0.9 1 0.1 Liberia
1920s 1.9 1 0.9 Belgium
1930s 2 1 1 Belgium
1940s 0.8 1 0.2 Liberia
1950s 2 0.9 1.1 Belgium
1960s 2 0 2 Belgium
1970s 2 0 2 Belgium
1980s 2 0.4 1.6 Belgium
1990s 2 0.3333 1.67 Belgium
2000s 2 1.1 0.9 Belgium
2010s 2 2 0
2020s 2 2 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher electoral democracy, Belgium or Liberia?
Belgium, at 2 against 2 in Liberia as of 2025.
What is the difference in electoral democracy between Belgium and Liberia?
0, with Belgium ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Liberia?
204 years are reported by both, from 1821 to 2025.
How do Belgium and Liberia rank globally for electoral democracy?
Belgium ranks 1st and Liberia ranks 1st of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Electoral democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Electoral democracy
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,594 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Identifies the political regime of a country using the Regimes of the World classification by political scientists Anna Lührmann, Marcus Tannenberg and Staffan Lindberg.