Bangladesh vs Kuwait: Electoral democracy

Bangladesh
0
in 2025
Kuwait
0
in 2025
Bangladesh rank
142nd
Kuwait rank
142nd

Electoral democracy over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Kuwait
00.511.52178919072025

How they compare

Bangladesh currently reports 0 against 0 in Kuwait, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 236 shared years of data; in 1789 it was Kuwait ahead.

Bangladesh ranks 142nd and Kuwait ranks 142nd of 176 countries.

Across the 25 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 4 and Kuwait in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Kuwait Difference Ahead
1780s 0 0 0
1790s 0 0 0
1800s 0 0 0
1810s 0 0 0
1820s 0 0 0
1830s 0 0 0
1840s 0 0 0
1850s 0 0 0
1860s 0 0 0
1870s 0 0 0
1880s 0 0 0
1890s 0 0 0
1900s 0 0 0
1910s 0 0 0
1920s 0 0 0
1930s 0 0 0
1940s 0.1 0 0.1 Bangladesh
1950s 0 0 0
1960s 0 0.5 0.5 Kuwait
1970s 0.4444 0.6667 0.2222 Kuwait
1980s 0.6 0.5 0.1 Bangladesh
1990s 1.8 0.8 1 Bangladesh
2000s 1.1 0.9 0.2 Bangladesh
2010s 1 1 0
2020s 0.8333 0.8333 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher electoral democracy, Bangladesh or Kuwait?
Bangladesh, at 0 against 0 in Kuwait as of 2025.
What is the difference in electoral democracy between Bangladesh and Kuwait?
0, with Bangladesh ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Kuwait?
236 years are reported by both, from 1789 to 2025.
How do Bangladesh and Kuwait rank globally for electoral democracy?
Bangladesh ranks 142nd and Kuwait ranks 142nd of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Electoral democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Electoral democracy
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,594 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Identifies the political regime of a country using the Regimes of the World classification by political scientists Anna Lührmann, Marcus Tannenberg and Staffan Lindberg.