Bangladesh vs Cuba: Electoral democracy

Bangladesh
0
in 2025
Cuba
0
in 2025
Bangladesh rank
142nd
Cuba rank
142nd

Electoral democracy over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Cuba
00.511.52178919072025

How they compare

Bangladesh currently reports 0 against 0 in Cuba, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 236 shared years of data; in 1789 it was Cuba ahead.

Bangladesh ranks 142nd and Cuba ranks 142nd of 176 countries.

Across the 25 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 6 and Cuba in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Cuba Difference Ahead
1780s 0 0 0
1790s 0 0 0
1800s 0 0 0
1810s 0 0 0
1820s 0 0 0
1830s 0 0 0
1840s 0 0 0
1850s 0 0 0
1860s 0 0 0
1870s 0 0 0
1880s 0 0 0
1890s 0 0 0
1900s 0 0.6 0.6 Cuba
1910s 0 1 1 Cuba
1920s 0 1 1 Cuba
1930s 0 0.7 0.7 Cuba
1940s 0.1 1 0.9 Cuba
1950s 0 0.6 0.6 Cuba
1960s 0 0 0
1970s 0.4444 0 0.4444 Bangladesh
1980s 0.6 0 0.6 Bangladesh
1990s 1.8 0 1.8 Bangladesh
2000s 1.1 0 1.1 Bangladesh
2010s 1 0 1 Bangladesh
2020s 0.8333 0 0.8333 Bangladesh

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher electoral democracy, Bangladesh or Cuba?
Bangladesh, at 0 against 0 in Cuba as of 2025.
What is the difference in electoral democracy between Bangladesh and Cuba?
0, with Bangladesh ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Cuba?
236 years are reported by both, from 1789 to 2025.
How do Bangladesh and Cuba rank globally for electoral democracy?
Bangladesh ranks 142nd and Cuba ranks 142nd of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Electoral democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Electoral democracy
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,594 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Identifies the political regime of a country using the Regimes of the World classification by political scientists Anna Lührmann, Marcus Tannenberg and Staffan Lindberg.