Algeria vs Equatorial Guinea: Electoral democracy

Algeria
1
in 2025
Equatorial Guinea
1
in 2025
Algeria rank
87th
Equatorial Guinea rank
87th

Electoral democracy over time

  • Algeria
  • Equatorial Guinea
00.20.40.60.81190019622025

How they compare

Algeria currently reports 1 against 1 in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 118 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Algeria ranks 87th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 87th of 176 countries.

Across the 13 decades both report, Algeria averaged higher in 1 and Equatorial Guinea in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Algeria Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
1900s 0 0 0
1910s 0 0 0
1920s 0 0 0
1930s 0 0 0
1940s 0 0 0
1950s 0 0 0
1960s 0.3 0.2 0.1 Algeria
1970s 0 0.6667 0.6667 Equatorial Guinea
1980s 0 0 0
1990s 0.4444 0.5556 0.1111 Equatorial Guinea
2000s 1 1 0
2010s 1 1 0
2020s 1 1 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher electoral democracy, Algeria or Equatorial Guinea?
Algeria, at 1 against 1 in Equatorial Guinea as of 2025.
What is the difference in electoral democracy between Algeria and Equatorial Guinea?
0, with Algeria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Algeria and Equatorial Guinea?
118 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
How do Algeria and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for electoral democracy?
Algeria ranks 87th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 87th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Electoral democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Electoral democracy
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,594 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Identifies the political regime of a country using the Regimes of the World classification by political scientists Anna Lührmann, Marcus Tannenberg and Staffan Lindberg.