Afghanistan vs Kuwait: Electoral democracy

Afghanistan
0
in 2025
Kuwait
0
in 2025
Afghanistan rank
142nd
Kuwait rank
142nd

Electoral democracy over time

  • Afghanistan
  • Kuwait
00.20.40.60.81178919072025

How they compare

Afghanistan currently reports 0 against 0 in Kuwait, a difference of 0.

Across all 236 years both countries report, Kuwait has been ahead every year.

Afghanistan ranks 142nd and Kuwait ranks 142nd of 176 countries.

Kuwait has averaged higher in every one of the 25 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Afghanistan Kuwait Difference Ahead
1780s 0 0 0
1790s 0 0 0
1800s 0 0 0
1810s 0 0 0
1820s 0 0 0
1830s 0 0 0
1840s 0 0 0
1850s 0 0 0
1860s 0 0 0
1870s 0 0 0
1880s 0 0 0
1890s 0 0 0
1900s 0 0 0
1910s 0 0 0
1920s 0 0 0
1930s 0 0 0
1940s 0 0 0
1950s 0 0 0
1960s 0 0.5 0.5 Kuwait
1970s 0 0.6 0.6 Kuwait
1980s 0 0.5 0.5 Kuwait
1990s 0 0.8 0.8 Kuwait
2000s 0.5556 0.8889 0.3333 Kuwait
2010s 1 1 0
2020s 0.1667 0.8333 0.6667 Kuwait

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher electoral democracy, Afghanistan or Kuwait?
Afghanistan, at 0 against 0 in Kuwait as of 2025.
What is the difference in electoral democracy between Afghanistan and Kuwait?
0, with Afghanistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Kuwait?
236 years are reported by both, from 1789 to 2025.
How do Afghanistan and Kuwait rank globally for electoral democracy?
Afghanistan ranks 142nd and Kuwait ranks 142nd of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Electoral democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Electoral democracy
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,594 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Identifies the political regime of a country using the Regimes of the World classification by political scientists Anna Lührmann, Marcus Tannenberg and Staffan Lindberg.