Mongolia vs Peru: Egalitarian Democracy Index
Mongolia
0.382
in 2025
Peru
0.388
in 2025
Mongolia rank
74th
Peru rank
71st
Egalitarian Democracy Index over time
- Mongolia
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 0.388 against 0.382 in Mongolia, a difference of 0.006.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 115 shared years of data; in 1911 it was Peru ahead.
Mongolia ranks 74th and Peru ranks 71st of 175 countries.
Across the 12 decades both report, Mongolia averaged higher in 9 and Peru in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 0.017 | 0.0352 | 0.0182 | Peru |
| 1920s | 0.112 | 0.0331 | 0.0789 | Mongolia |
| 1930s | 0.1572 | 0.0282 | 0.129 | Mongolia |
| 1940s | 0.1698 | 0.0493 | 0.1205 | Mongolia |
| 1950s | 0.1893 | 0.049 | 0.1403 | Mongolia |
| 1960s | 0.2047 | 0.1181 | 0.0866 | Mongolia |
| 1970s | 0.2093 | 0.1263 | 0.083 | Mongolia |
| 1980s | 0.2099 | 0.3101 | 0.1002 | Peru |
| 1990s | 0.5475 | 0.1848 | 0.3627 | Mongolia |
| 2000s | 0.531 | 0.4518 | 0.0792 | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 0.5179 | 0.5081 | 0.0098 | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 0.3958 | 0.437 | 0.0412 | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher egalitarian democracy index, Mongolia or Peru?
- Peru, at 0.388 against 0.382 in Mongolia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in egalitarian democracy index between Mongolia and Peru?
- 0.006, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Peru?
- 115 years are reported by both, from 1911 to 2025.
- How do Mongolia and Peru rank globally for egalitarian democracy index?
- Mongolia ranks 74th and Peru ranks 71st of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Egalitarian Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which the protection of rights, access to power, and distribution of resources is equal.