Mexico vs Zambia: Egalitarian Democracy Index
Mexico
0.265
in 2025
Zambia
0.266
in 2025
Mexico rank
97th
Zambia rank
96th
Egalitarian Democracy Index over time
- Mexico
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 0.266 against 0.265 in Mexico, a difference of 0.001.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 115 shared years of data; in 1911 it was Mexico ahead.
Mexico ranks 97th and Zambia ranks 96th of 175 countries.
Across the 12 decades both report, Mexico averaged higher in 8 and Zambia in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mexico | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 0.049 | 0.019 | 0.03 | Mexico |
| 1920s | 0.0662 | 0.0198 | 0.0464 | Mexico |
| 1930s | 0.0833 | 0.0217 | 0.0616 | Mexico |
| 1940s | 0.0923 | 0.0228 | 0.0695 | Mexico |
| 1950s | 0.1025 | 0.0294 | 0.0731 | Mexico |
| 1960s | 0.1173 | 0.1181 | 0.0008 | Zambia |
| 1970s | 0.1354 | 0.1729 | 0.0375 | Zambia |
| 1980s | 0.1633 | 0.1838 | 0.0205 | Zambia |
| 1990s | 0.2409 | 0.2895 | 0.0486 | Zambia |
| 2000s | 0.3461 | 0.3196 | 0.0265 | Mexico |
| 2010s | 0.3408 | 0.2866 | 0.0542 | Mexico |
| 2020s | 0.308 | 0.2905 | 0.0175 | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher egalitarian democracy index, Mexico or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 0.266 against 0.265 in Mexico as of 2025.
- What is the difference in egalitarian democracy index between Mexico and Zambia?
- 0.001, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Zambia?
- 115 years are reported by both, from 1911 to 2025.
- How do Mexico and Zambia rank globally for egalitarian democracy index?
- Mexico ranks 97th and Zambia ranks 96th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Egalitarian Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which the protection of rights, access to power, and distribution of resources is equal.