Malta vs Uruguay: Egalitarian Democracy Index
Malta
0.694
in 2025
Uruguay
0.693
in 2025
Malta rank
24th
Uruguay rank
25th
Egalitarian Democracy Index over time
- Malta
- Uruguay
How they compare
Malta currently reports 0.694 against 0.693 in Uruguay, a difference of 0.001.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Uruguay ahead.
Malta ranks 24th and Uruguay ranks 25th of 175 countries.
Across the 13 decades both report, Malta averaged higher in 2 and Uruguay in 11.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0.112 | 0.2167 | 0.1047 | Uruguay |
| 1910s | 0.112 | 0.2664 | 0.1544 | Uruguay |
| 1920s | 0.2024 | 0.3883 | 0.1859 | Uruguay |
| 1930s | 0.166 | 0.3633 | 0.1973 | Uruguay |
| 1940s | 0.2269 | 0.5515 | 0.3246 | Uruguay |
| 1950s | 0.4247 | 0.6279 | 0.2032 | Uruguay |
| 1960s | 0.4587 | 0.596 | 0.1373 | Uruguay |
| 1970s | 0.5698 | 0.2798 | 0.29 | Malta |
| 1980s | 0.5775 | 0.4389 | 0.1386 | Malta |
| 1990s | 0.662 | 0.7292 | 0.0672 | Uruguay |
| 2000s | 0.6844 | 0.7682 | 0.0838 | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 0.6853 | 0.8025 | 0.1172 | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 0.6883 | 0.7035 | 0.0152 | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher egalitarian democracy index, Malta or Uruguay?
- Malta, at 0.694 against 0.693 in Uruguay as of 2025.
- What is the difference in egalitarian democracy index between Malta and Uruguay?
- 0.001, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Uruguay?
- 126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Malta and Uruguay rank globally for egalitarian democracy index?
- Malta ranks 24th and Uruguay ranks 25th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Egalitarian Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which the protection of rights, access to power, and distribution of resources is equal.