Malawi vs Nigeria: Egalitarian Democracy Index
Malawi
0.317
in 2025
Nigeria
0.317
in 2025
Malawi rank
89th
Nigeria rank
89th
Egalitarian Democracy Index over time
- Malawi
- Nigeria
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 0.317 against 0.317 in Nigeria, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 112 shared years of data; in 1914 it was Nigeria ahead.
Malawi ranks 89th and Nigeria ranks 89th of 175 countries.
Across the 12 decades both report, Malawi averaged higher in 5 and Nigeria in 7.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Nigeria | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 0.009 | 0.061 | 0.052 | Nigeria |
| 1920s | 0.009 | 0.0646 | 0.0556 | Nigeria |
| 1930s | 0.009 | 0.066 | 0.057 | Nigeria |
| 1940s | 0.0132 | 0.0659 | 0.0527 | Nigeria |
| 1950s | 0.016 | 0.0754 | 0.0594 | Nigeria |
| 1960s | 0.098 | 0.1052 | 0.0072 | Nigeria |
| 1970s | 0.1262 | 0.0953 | 0.0309 | Malawi |
| 1980s | 0.12 | 0.1208 | 0.0008 | Nigeria |
| 1990s | 0.245 | 0.1413 | 0.1037 | Malawi |
| 2000s | 0.2904 | 0.243 | 0.0474 | Malawi |
| 2010s | 0.3178 | 0.2921 | 0.0257 | Malawi |
| 2020s | 0.3335 | 0.2863 | 0.0472 | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher egalitarian democracy index, Malawi or Nigeria?
- Malawi, at 0.317 against 0.317 in Nigeria as of 2025.
- What is the difference in egalitarian democracy index between Malawi and Nigeria?
- 0, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Nigeria?
- 112 years are reported by both, from 1914 to 2025.
- How do Malawi and Nigeria rank globally for egalitarian democracy index?
- Malawi ranks 89th and Nigeria ranks 89th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Egalitarian Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which the protection of rights, access to power, and distribution of resources is equal.