Libya vs Pakistan: Egalitarian Democracy Index
Libya
0.123
in 2025
Pakistan
0.123
in 2025
Libya rank
147th
Pakistan rank
147th
Egalitarian Democracy Index over time
- Libya
- Pakistan
How they compare
Libya currently reports 0.123 against 0.123 in Pakistan, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 83 shared years of data; in 1934 it was Pakistan ahead.
Libya ranks 147th and Pakistan ranks 147th of 175 countries.
Across the 10 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 7 and Pakistan in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1930s | 0.04 | 0.0952 | 0.0552 | Pakistan |
| 1940s | 0.0385 | 0.097 | 0.0585 | Pakistan |
| 1950s | 0.1087 | 0.0862 | 0.0224 | Libya |
| 1960s | 0.1161 | 0.0837 | 0.0324 | Libya |
| 1970s | 0.125 | 0.0799 | 0.0451 | Libya |
| 1980s | 0.125 | 0.08 | 0.045 | Libya |
| 1990s | 0.125 | 0.1335 | 0.0085 | Pakistan |
| 2000s | 0.1249 | 0.1202 | 0.0047 | Libya |
| 2010s | 0.1975 | 0.1506 | 0.0469 | Libya |
| 2020s | 0.136 | 0.1292 | 0.0068 | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher egalitarian democracy index, Libya or Pakistan?
- Libya, at 0.123 against 0.123 in Pakistan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in egalitarian democracy index between Libya and Pakistan?
- 0, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Pakistan?
- 83 years are reported by both, from 1934 to 2025.
- How do Libya and Pakistan rank globally for egalitarian democracy index?
- Libya ranks 147th and Pakistan ranks 147th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Egalitarian Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which the protection of rights, access to power, and distribution of resources is equal.