Lao PDR vs Libya: Egalitarian Democracy Index

Lao PDR
0.114
in 2025
Libya
0.123
in 2025
Lao PDR rank
150th
Libya rank
147th

Egalitarian Democracy Index over time

  • Lao PDR
  • Libya
00.10.20.3190019622025

How they compare

Libya currently reports 0.123 against 0.114 in Lao PDR, a difference of 0.009.

That makes Libya's figure about 1.1 times Lao PDR's.

Across all 83 years both countries report, Libya has been ahead every year.

Lao PDR ranks 150th and Libya ranks 147th of 175 countries.

Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 10 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lao PDR Libya Difference Ahead
1930s 0.025 0.04 0.015 Libya
1940s 0.0195 0.0385 0.019 Libya
1950s 0.0742 0.1087 0.0344 Libya
1960s 0.0773 0.1161 0.0388 Libya
1970s 0.0941 0.125 0.0309 Libya
1980s 0.1083 0.125 0.0167 Libya
1990s 0.1085 0.125 0.0165 Libya
2000s 0.1001 0.1249 0.0248 Libya
2010s 0.0999 0.1975 0.0976 Libya
2020s 0.1218 0.136 0.0142 Libya

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher egalitarian democracy index, Lao PDR or Libya?
Libya, at 0.123 against 0.114 in Lao PDR as of 2025.
What is the difference in egalitarian democracy index between Lao PDR and Libya?
0.009, with Libya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lao PDR and Libya?
83 years are reported by both, from 1934 to 2025.
How do Lao PDR and Libya rank globally for egalitarian democracy index?
Lao PDR ranks 150th and Libya ranks 147th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Egalitarian Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Egalitarian Democracy Index
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
175 places, 20,734 data points, 1900–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which the protection of rights, access to power, and distribution of resources is equal.