Jordan vs Niger: Egalitarian Democracy Index
Jordan
0.211
in 2025
Niger
0.214
in 2025
Jordan rank
113th
Niger rank
112th
Egalitarian Democracy Index over time
- Jordan
- Niger
How they compare
Niger currently reports 0.214 against 0.211 in Jordan, a difference of 0.003.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 104 shared years of data; in 1922 it was Jordan ahead.
Jordan ranks 113th and Niger ranks 112th of 175 countries.
Across the 11 decades both report, Jordan averaged higher in 7 and Niger in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Niger | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | 0.1344 | 0.055 | 0.0794 | Jordan |
| 1930s | 0.136 | 0.059 | 0.077 | Jordan |
| 1940s | 0.1372 | 0.0648 | 0.0724 | Jordan |
| 1950s | 0.1532 | 0.0715 | 0.0817 | Jordan |
| 1960s | 0.1505 | 0.1431 | 0.0074 | Jordan |
| 1970s | 0.1484 | 0.145 | 0.0034 | Jordan |
| 1980s | 0.1535 | 0.1452 | 0.0083 | Jordan |
| 1990s | 0.1971 | 0.2959 | 0.0988 | Niger |
| 2000s | 0.1785 | 0.377 | 0.1985 | Niger |
| 2010s | 0.2067 | 0.3818 | 0.1751 | Niger |
| 2020s | 0.2043 | 0.297 | 0.0927 | Niger |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher egalitarian democracy index, Jordan or Niger?
- Niger, at 0.214 against 0.211 in Jordan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in egalitarian democracy index between Jordan and Niger?
- 0.003, with Niger ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Niger?
- 104 years are reported by both, from 1922 to 2025.
- How do Jordan and Niger rank globally for egalitarian democracy index?
- Jordan ranks 113th and Niger ranks 112th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Egalitarian Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which the protection of rights, access to power, and distribution of resources is equal.