Egypt vs Qatar: Egalitarian Democracy Index
Egypt
0.106
in 2025
Qatar
0.101
in 2025
Egypt rank
156th
Qatar rank
158th
Egalitarian Democracy Index over time
- Egypt
- Qatar
How they compare
Egypt currently reports 0.106 against 0.101 in Qatar, a difference of 0.005.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Egypt ahead.
Egypt ranks 156th and Qatar ranks 158th of 175 countries.
Across the 13 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 9 and Qatar in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Qatar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0.0627 | 0.029 | 0.0337 | Egypt |
| 1910s | 0.0595 | 0.0324 | 0.0271 | Egypt |
| 1920s | 0.061 | 0.046 | 0.015 | Egypt |
| 1930s | 0.0625 | 0.046 | 0.0165 | Egypt |
| 1940s | 0.07 | 0.049 | 0.021 | Egypt |
| 1950s | 0.1342 | 0.0524 | 0.0818 | Egypt |
| 1960s | 0.1628 | 0.0624 | 0.1004 | Egypt |
| 1970s | 0.1238 | 0.0911 | 0.0327 | Egypt |
| 1980s | 0.1174 | 0.0989 | 0.0185 | Egypt |
| 1990s | 0.1125 | 0.113 | 0.0005 | Qatar |
| 2000s | 0.0906 | 0.113 | 0.0224 | Qatar |
| 2010s | 0.0957 | 0.1141 | 0.0184 | Qatar |
| 2020s | 0.1053 | 0.1062 | 0.0008 | Qatar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher egalitarian democracy index, Egypt or Qatar?
- Egypt, at 0.106 against 0.101 in Qatar as of 2025.
- What is the difference in egalitarian democracy index between Egypt and Qatar?
- 0.005, with Egypt ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Qatar?
- 126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Egypt and Qatar rank globally for egalitarian democracy index?
- Egypt ranks 156th and Qatar ranks 158th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Egalitarian Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which the protection of rights, access to power, and distribution of resources is equal.