Czechia vs Sweden: Egalitarian Democracy Index
Czechia
0.767
in 2025
Sweden
0.802
in 2025
Czechia rank
9th
Sweden rank
7th
Egalitarian Democracy Index over time
- Czechia
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 0.802 against 0.767 in Czechia, a difference of 0.035.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 108 shared years of data; in 1918 it was Sweden ahead.
Czechia ranks 9th and Sweden ranks 7th of 175 countries.
Across the 12 decades both report, Czechia averaged higher in 2 and Sweden in 10.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 0.308 | 0.324 | 0.016 | Sweden |
| 1920s | 0.6506 | 0.4804 | 0.1702 | Czechia |
| 1930s | 0.5775 | 0.5262 | 0.0513 | Czechia |
| 1940s | 0.1963 | 0.555 | 0.3587 | Sweden |
| 1950s | 0.2381 | 0.6463 | 0.4082 | Sweden |
| 1960s | 0.2482 | 0.6953 | 0.4471 | Sweden |
| 1970s | 0.2397 | 0.833 | 0.5933 | Sweden |
| 1980s | 0.2493 | 0.8655 | 0.6162 | Sweden |
| 1990s | 0.7935 | 0.8729 | 0.0794 | Sweden |
| 2000s | 0.8055 | 0.8673 | 0.0618 | Sweden |
| 2010s | 0.7694 | 0.8512 | 0.0818 | Sweden |
| 2020s | 0.753 | 0.8098 | 0.0568 | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher egalitarian democracy index, Czechia or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 0.802 against 0.767 in Czechia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in egalitarian democracy index between Czechia and Sweden?
- 0.035, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Sweden?
- 108 years are reported by both, from 1918 to 2025.
- How do Czechia and Sweden rank globally for egalitarian democracy index?
- Czechia ranks 9th and Sweden ranks 7th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Egalitarian Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which the protection of rights, access to power, and distribution of resources is equal.