Cyprus vs Malta: Egalitarian Democracy Index
Cyprus
0.684
in 2025
Malta
0.694
in 2025
Cyprus rank
27th
Malta rank
24th
Egalitarian Democracy Index over time
- Cyprus
- Malta
How they compare
Malta currently reports 0.694 against 0.684 in Cyprus, a difference of 0.01.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Malta ahead.
Cyprus ranks 27th and Malta ranks 24th of 175 countries.
Across the 13 decades both report, Cyprus averaged higher in 2 and Malta in 11.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cyprus | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0.0782 | 0.112 | 0.0338 | Malta |
| 1910s | 0.078 | 0.112 | 0.034 | Malta |
| 1920s | 0.0784 | 0.2024 | 0.124 | Malta |
| 1930s | 0.0733 | 0.166 | 0.0927 | Malta |
| 1940s | 0.0792 | 0.2269 | 0.1477 | Malta |
| 1950s | 0.0803 | 0.4247 | 0.3444 | Malta |
| 1960s | 0.2941 | 0.4587 | 0.1646 | Malta |
| 1970s | 0.3752 | 0.5698 | 0.1946 | Malta |
| 1980s | 0.5297 | 0.5775 | 0.0478 | Malta |
| 1990s | 0.6176 | 0.662 | 0.0444 | Malta |
| 2000s | 0.6956 | 0.6844 | 0.0112 | Cyprus |
| 2010s | 0.7314 | 0.6853 | 0.0461 | Cyprus |
| 2020s | 0.6862 | 0.6883 | 0.0022 | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher egalitarian democracy index, Cyprus or Malta?
- Malta, at 0.694 against 0.684 in Cyprus as of 2025.
- What is the difference in egalitarian democracy index between Cyprus and Malta?
- 0.01, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Malta?
- 126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Cyprus and Malta rank globally for egalitarian democracy index?
- Cyprus ranks 27th and Malta ranks 24th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Egalitarian Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which the protection of rights, access to power, and distribution of resources is equal.