Cuba vs Niger: Egalitarian Democracy Index

Cuba
0.224
in 2025
Niger
0.214
in 2025
Cuba rank
109th
Niger rank
112th

Egalitarian Democracy Index over time

  • Cuba
  • Niger
0.10.20.30.4190219632025

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 0.224 against 0.214 in Niger, a difference of 0.01.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 104 shared years of data; in 1922 it was Cuba ahead.

Cuba ranks 109th and Niger ranks 112th of 175 countries.

Across the 11 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 7 and Niger in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Niger Difference Ahead
1920s 0.1134 0.055 0.0584 Cuba
1930s 0.115 0.059 0.056 Cuba
1940s 0.1665 0.0648 0.1017 Cuba
1950s 0.119 0.0715 0.0475 Cuba
1960s 0.2166 0.1431 0.0735 Cuba
1970s 0.2168 0.145 0.0718 Cuba
1980s 0.224 0.1452 0.0788 Cuba
1990s 0.2299 0.2959 0.066 Niger
2000s 0.2294 0.377 0.1476 Niger
2010s 0.2382 0.3818 0.1436 Niger
2020s 0.238 0.297 0.059 Niger

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher egalitarian democracy index, Cuba or Niger?
Cuba, at 0.224 against 0.214 in Niger as of 2025.
What is the difference in egalitarian democracy index between Cuba and Niger?
0.01, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Niger?
104 years are reported by both, from 1922 to 2025.
How do Cuba and Niger rank globally for egalitarian democracy index?
Cuba ranks 109th and Niger ranks 112th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Egalitarian Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Egalitarian Democracy Index
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
175 places, 20,734 data points, 1900–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which the protection of rights, access to power, and distribution of resources is equal.