Congo vs Egypt: Egalitarian Democracy Index
Congo
0.107
in 2025
Egypt
0.106
in 2025
Congo rank
155th
Egypt rank
156th
Egalitarian Democracy Index over time
- Congo
- Egypt
How they compare
Congo currently reports 0.107 against 0.106 in Egypt, a difference of 0.001.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 123 shared years of data; in 1903 it was Egypt ahead.
Congo ranks 155th and Egypt ranks 156th of 175 countries.
Across the 13 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 4 and Egypt in 9.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Egypt | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0.028 | 0.0629 | 0.0349 | Egypt |
| 1910s | 0.028 | 0.0595 | 0.0315 | Egypt |
| 1920s | 0.028 | 0.061 | 0.033 | Egypt |
| 1930s | 0.028 | 0.0625 | 0.0345 | Egypt |
| 1940s | 0.0316 | 0.07 | 0.0384 | Egypt |
| 1950s | 0.0432 | 0.1342 | 0.091 | Egypt |
| 1960s | 0.0992 | 0.1628 | 0.0636 | Egypt |
| 1970s | 0.0555 | 0.1238 | 0.0683 | Egypt |
| 1980s | 0.0567 | 0.1174 | 0.0607 | Egypt |
| 1990s | 0.1446 | 0.1125 | 0.0321 | Congo |
| 2000s | 0.0915 | 0.0906 | 0.0009 | Congo |
| 2010s | 0.1066 | 0.0957 | 0.0109 | Congo |
| 2020s | 0.134 | 0.1053 | 0.0287 | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher egalitarian democracy index, Congo or Egypt?
- Congo, at 0.107 against 0.106 in Egypt as of 2025.
- What is the difference in egalitarian democracy index between Congo and Egypt?
- 0.001, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Egypt?
- 123 years are reported by both, from 1903 to 2025.
- How do Congo and Egypt rank globally for egalitarian democracy index?
- Congo ranks 155th and Egypt ranks 156th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Egalitarian Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which the protection of rights, access to power, and distribution of resources is equal.