Comoros vs Niger: Egalitarian Democracy Index

Comoros
0.222
in 2025
Niger
0.214
in 2025
Comoros rank
110th
Niger rank
112th

Egalitarian Democracy Index over time

  • Comoros
  • Niger
00.10.20.30.4190019622025

How they compare

Comoros currently reports 0.222 against 0.214 in Niger, a difference of 0.008.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 80 shared years of data; in 1946 it was Niger ahead.

Comoros ranks 110th and Niger ranks 112th of 175 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, Comoros averaged higher in 1 and Niger in 8.

Head to head by decade

Decade Comoros Niger Difference Ahead
1940s 0.0605 0.0645 0.004 Niger
1950s 0.0656 0.0715 0.0059 Niger
1960s 0.077 0.1431 0.0661 Niger
1970s 0.1281 0.145 0.0169 Niger
1980s 0.1525 0.1452 0.0073 Comoros
1990s 0.2662 0.2959 0.0297 Niger
2000s 0.2666 0.377 0.1104 Niger
2010s 0.2833 0.3818 0.0985 Niger
2020s 0.221 0.297 0.076 Niger

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher egalitarian democracy index, Comoros or Niger?
Comoros, at 0.222 against 0.214 in Niger as of 2025.
What is the difference in egalitarian democracy index between Comoros and Niger?
0.008, with Comoros ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Niger?
80 years are reported by both, from 1946 to 2025.
How do Comoros and Niger rank globally for egalitarian democracy index?
Comoros ranks 110th and Niger ranks 112th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Egalitarian Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Egalitarian Democracy Index
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
175 places, 20,734 data points, 1900–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which the protection of rights, access to power, and distribution of resources is equal.