Comoros vs Jordan: Egalitarian Democracy Index
Comoros
0.222
in 2025
Jordan
0.211
in 2025
Comoros rank
110th
Jordan rank
113th
Egalitarian Democracy Index over time
- Comoros
- Jordan
How they compare
Comoros currently reports 0.222 against 0.211 in Jordan, a difference of 0.011.
That makes Comoros's figure about 1.1 times Jordan's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 80 shared years of data; in 1946 it was Jordan ahead.
Comoros ranks 110th and Jordan ranks 113th of 175 countries.
Across the 9 decades both report, Comoros averaged higher in 4 and Jordan in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Comoros | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1940s | 0.0605 | 0.139 | 0.0785 | Jordan |
| 1950s | 0.0656 | 0.1532 | 0.0876 | Jordan |
| 1960s | 0.077 | 0.1505 | 0.0735 | Jordan |
| 1970s | 0.1281 | 0.1484 | 0.0203 | Jordan |
| 1980s | 0.1525 | 0.1535 | 0.001 | Jordan |
| 1990s | 0.2662 | 0.1971 | 0.0691 | Comoros |
| 2000s | 0.2666 | 0.1785 | 0.0881 | Comoros |
| 2010s | 0.2833 | 0.2067 | 0.0766 | Comoros |
| 2020s | 0.221 | 0.2043 | 0.0167 | Comoros |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher egalitarian democracy index, Comoros or Jordan?
- Comoros, at 0.222 against 0.211 in Jordan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in egalitarian democracy index between Comoros and Jordan?
- 0.011, with Comoros ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Jordan?
- 80 years are reported by both, from 1946 to 2025.
- How do Comoros and Jordan rank globally for egalitarian democracy index?
- Comoros ranks 110th and Jordan ranks 113th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Egalitarian Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which the protection of rights, access to power, and distribution of resources is equal.