Comoros vs Cuba: Egalitarian Democracy Index

Comoros
0.222
in 2025
Cuba
0.224
in 2025
Comoros rank
110th
Cuba rank
109th

Egalitarian Democracy Index over time

  • Comoros
  • Cuba
00.10.20.3190019622025

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 0.224 against 0.222 in Comoros, a difference of 0.002.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 92 shared years of data; in 1902 it was Cuba ahead.

Comoros ranks 110th and Cuba ranks 109th of 175 countries.

Across the 11 decades both report, Comoros averaged higher in 3 and Cuba in 8.

Head to head by decade

Decade Comoros Cuba Difference Ahead
1900s 0.045 0.1085 0.0635 Cuba
1910s 0.0452 0.1175 0.0722 Cuba
1940s 0.0605 0.1683 0.1078 Cuba
1950s 0.0656 0.119 0.0534 Cuba
1960s 0.077 0.2166 0.1396 Cuba
1970s 0.1281 0.2168 0.0887 Cuba
1980s 0.1525 0.224 0.0715 Cuba
1990s 0.2662 0.2299 0.0363 Comoros
2000s 0.2666 0.2294 0.0372 Comoros
2010s 0.2833 0.2382 0.0451 Comoros
2020s 0.221 0.238 0.017 Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher egalitarian democracy index, Comoros or Cuba?
Cuba, at 0.224 against 0.222 in Comoros as of 2025.
What is the difference in egalitarian democracy index between Comoros and Cuba?
0.002, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Cuba?
92 years are reported by both, from 1902 to 2025.
How do Comoros and Cuba rank globally for egalitarian democracy index?
Comoros ranks 110th and Cuba ranks 109th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Egalitarian Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Egalitarian Democracy Index
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
175 places, 20,734 data points, 1900–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which the protection of rights, access to power, and distribution of resources is equal.