Cameroon vs Kuwait: Egalitarian Democracy Index

Cameroon
0.178
in 2025
Kuwait
0.171
in 2025
Cameroon rank
122nd
Kuwait rank
124th

Egalitarian Democracy Index over time

  • Cameroon
  • Kuwait
00.050.10.150.20.25190019622025

How they compare

Cameroon currently reports 0.178 against 0.171 in Kuwait, a difference of 0.007.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Kuwait ahead.

Cameroon ranks 122nd and Kuwait ranks 124th of 175 countries.

Kuwait has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cameroon Kuwait Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1072 0.1951 0.0879 Kuwait
1970s 0.106 0.1933 0.0873 Kuwait
1980s 0.1267 0.1856 0.0589 Kuwait
1990s 0.1659 0.2097 0.0438 Kuwait
2000s 0.1927 0.2345 0.0418 Kuwait
2010s 0.1962 0.2452 0.049 Kuwait
2020s 0.1885 0.218 0.0295 Kuwait

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher egalitarian democracy index, Cameroon or Kuwait?
Cameroon, at 0.178 against 0.171 in Kuwait as of 2025.
What is the difference in egalitarian democracy index between Cameroon and Kuwait?
0.007, with Cameroon ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Kuwait?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2025.
How do Cameroon and Kuwait rank globally for egalitarian democracy index?
Cameroon ranks 122nd and Kuwait ranks 124th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Egalitarian Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Egalitarian Democracy Index
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
175 places, 20,734 data points, 1900–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which the protection of rights, access to power, and distribution of resources is equal.