Cameroon vs Guinea-Bissau: Egalitarian Democracy Index
Cameroon
0.178
in 2025
Guinea-Bissau
0.171
in 2025
Cameroon rank
122nd
Guinea-Bissau rank
124th
Egalitarian Democracy Index over time
- Cameroon
- Guinea-Bissau
How they compare
Cameroon currently reports 0.178 against 0.171 in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 0.007.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cameroon ahead.
Cameroon ranks 122nd and Guinea-Bissau ranks 124th of 175 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Cameroon averaged higher in 4 and Guinea-Bissau in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cameroon | Guinea-Bissau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.1072 | 0.017 | 0.0902 | Cameroon |
| 1970s | 0.106 | 0.0699 | 0.0361 | Cameroon |
| 1980s | 0.1267 | 0.0942 | 0.0325 | Cameroon |
| 1990s | 0.1659 | 0.1491 | 0.0168 | Cameroon |
| 2000s | 0.1927 | 0.2276 | 0.0349 | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2010s | 0.1962 | 0.2507 | 0.0545 | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2020s | 0.1885 | 0.2373 | 0.0488 | Guinea-Bissau |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher egalitarian democracy index, Cameroon or Guinea-Bissau?
- Cameroon, at 0.178 against 0.171 in Guinea-Bissau as of 2025.
- What is the difference in egalitarian democracy index between Cameroon and Guinea-Bissau?
- 0.007, with Cameroon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Guinea-Bissau?
- 65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2025.
- How do Cameroon and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for egalitarian democracy index?
- Cameroon ranks 122nd and Guinea-Bissau ranks 124th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Egalitarian Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which the protection of rights, access to power, and distribution of resources is equal.