Cambodia vs Chad: Egalitarian Democracy Index
Cambodia
0.084
in 2025
Chad
0.084
in 2025
Cambodia rank
164th
Chad rank
164th
Egalitarian Democracy Index over time
- Cambodia
- Chad
How they compare
Cambodia currently reports 0.084 against 0.084 in Chad, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 106 shared years of data; in 1920 it was Chad ahead.
Cambodia ranks 164th and Chad ranks 164th of 175 countries.
Across the 11 decades both report, Cambodia averaged higher in 5 and Chad in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Chad | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | 0.011 | 0.063 | 0.052 | Chad |
| 1930s | 0.011 | 0.063 | 0.052 | Chad |
| 1940s | 0.0135 | 0.0678 | 0.0543 | Chad |
| 1950s | 0.0688 | 0.0885 | 0.0197 | Chad |
| 1960s | 0.118 | 0.1087 | 0.0093 | Cambodia |
| 1970s | 0.0535 | 0.0923 | 0.0388 | Chad |
| 1980s | 0.0489 | 0.0699 | 0.021 | Chad |
| 1990s | 0.1051 | 0.0843 | 0.0208 | Cambodia |
| 2000s | 0.1172 | 0.1069 | 0.0103 | Cambodia |
| 2010s | 0.1067 | 0.1 | 0.0067 | Cambodia |
| 2020s | 0.0863 | 0.0777 | 0.0087 | Cambodia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher egalitarian democracy index, Cambodia or Chad?
- Cambodia, at 0.084 against 0.084 in Chad as of 2025.
- What is the difference in egalitarian democracy index between Cambodia and Chad?
- 0, with Cambodia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Chad?
- 106 years are reported by both, from 1920 to 2025.
- How do Cambodia and Chad rank globally for egalitarian democracy index?
- Cambodia ranks 164th and Chad ranks 164th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Egalitarian Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which the protection of rights, access to power, and distribution of resources is equal.